Click Here!Click Here!
Home / U.S / Why did Black Lives Matter protesters close down a Bay Bridge?
Why did Black Lives Matter protesters close down a Bay Bridge?

Why did Black Lives Matter protesters close down a Bay Bridge?

Black Lives Matter protesters cumulative themselves together opposite a San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Monday, restraint westbound rush-hour traffic. 

Protesters blocked a 5 lanes headed into San Francisco only before 4 p.m., causing all trade to be stopped for during slightest 30 minutes. California Highway Patrol gradually reopened all 5 lanes within an hour and a half, though complicated trade persisted for hours afterward. 

“In a bold arrangement of oneness and a suggestion of MLK, Black.Seed, a Black, odd ransom collective, has close down a Bay Bridge as a uncover of insurgency to a complement that continue to annoy Black, Queer, Brown, Indigenous and other marginalized people via a Bay Area,” a Anti Police-Terror Project posted on their website Monday.  

The protesters had several demands. They called for a repurposing of city policing supports toward affordable housing; a abdication of Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf; and a evident stop of San Francisco Police Chief Greg Suhr, Oakland Police Chief Sean Whent and a Bay Area officers concerned in 8 argumentative military shootings within a past dual years. 

One of a victims, Mario Woods, was shot by police in early Dec after officers reported Woods refused to dump a kitchen blade he was carrying. Cell-phone video footage of a sharpened hurt many protesters who contend Woods was not behaving aggressively.

Yuvette Henderson, another one of a 8 victims, was killed by military officers in Oakland who suspected her of shoplifting. Ms. Henderson was armed with a pistol, though a civil-rights censure alleges that she never lifted a arms to police.

“The bother we might have gifted currently on a overpass – suppose what it’s like to have your life and your contentment continuously inconvenienced as a black person,” Mia Birdson, a Black.Seed member, told NBC New York. 

If a protesters hoped to inspire open support for their cause, Monday’s traffic-tactic might have been unsuccessful. 

“I feel like whatever they’re protesting, I wish to be opposite it right now,” Chris Day told SF Gate. Mr. Day was pushing to his home in Redwood City when he got stranded in a criticism traffic. “People have a right to protest, though they don’t have a right to retard traffic. What if someone has a pursuit talk or an critical appointment?”

Another driver, Robert Holtz of Ripon, told SF Gate that a trade was preventing him from attending a commemorative service. 

“They could put their energies into a lot some-more useful venues than sitting on a overpass and making everybody suffer,” he said. 

All 25 protesters were arrested and requisitioned into San Francisco County Jail on misconduct charges of open nuisance, wrong assembly, interference giveaway passage, and fake imprisonment. 

The criticism might have been unpopular, though a overpass had chronological stress on Martin Luther King Jr. Day.  

“Blocking city streets has been an civic criticism tactic given there were civic protests,” Sarah Goodyear writes for The Atlantic City Lab. 

One of a many important US highway protests was King’s five-day impetus from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama in 1965. Federal District Court Judge Frank Johnson Jr. after inspected a impetus as legal, a rarely argumentative statute during a time.

“The law is transparent that a right to petition one’s supervision for a calibrate of grievances might be exercised in vast groups …,” wrote Judge Johnson, “and these rights might be exercised by marching, even along open highways.”

About admin

Scroll To Top