Click Here!Click Here!
Home / Spotlight / The Suburb That Tried To Kill a Car
The Suburb That Tried To Kill a Car

The Suburb That Tried To Kill a Car

At initial glance, downtown Evanston, Illinois, doesn’t demeanour revolutionary—just another a gentrifying civic core with a requisite Whole Foods, a internal organic tolerable restaurants portion $14 cocktails, a mountainous new, high-end oppulance apartments filled with immaculate steel appliances and slab countertops. The sepulchral downtown feels increasingly hip; this summer it was featured as a “Surfacing” end in a New York Times Travel Section. “I have all here,” says Joanne McCall, pausing one dusk on her proceed inside Sherman Plaza, a soaring, 26-story condominium building. “The post office, a dry cleaner, a movies, we work out upstairs, a Whole Foods is over there, a hair dresser over here. And a Uber thing is removing vast here.”

It takes, in fact, a few additional mins in a area to comprehend what’s different—and what’s missing. Downtown Evanston—a sturdy, tree-lined Victorian city wedged orderly between Lake Michigan and Chicago’s northern border—is blank cars. Or, some-more accurately, it’s blank a lot of cars. Thanks to accordant planning, these new developments are rising within a 10-minute travel of dual rail lines and half-a-dozen sight routes. The internal vehicle tenure rate is scarcely half that of a surrounding area.

Story Continued Below

Which again, might sound like so many other gentrifying civic areas. Who owns a vehicle in Brooklyn, after all? But Evanston isn’t Park Slope—the city, now 75,000 strong, is quintessentially a suburb, somewhere to shun a firmness of circuitously Chicago, a place to get additional room and, especially, a place to expostulate your car, jetting down Lake Shore Drive or a Edens Expressway to a Windy City. The houses in Evanston were so idyllic, in fact, that filmmakers came to use it as a beau ideal of postwar suburban life—it was where Hollywood came to film all-American suburban cinema like Sixteen Candles, Dennis a Menace, Uncle Buck, and both Home Alone 2 and Home Alone 3.

And a whole indicate of a suburbs, reinforced by decades of internal zoning laws and developers’ skeleton for a car-centric lifestyle, was that we weren’t ostensible to live on tip of your neighbor, that there was ostensible to be copiousness of parking everywhere we went and that we weren’t ostensible to travel anywhere.

But Evanston had a opposite idea: What if a suburban downtown became a place where pedestrians ruled and cars were actively discouraged? As it turns out, what looks like normal civic gentrification indeed outlines a success of one of a many insubordinate suburbs in America. And a proceed to expansion is quick apropos a indication opposite a region—a indication even embraced by a civic neighbor to a south, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Evanston, Chicago and their neighbors all now wish to attract some-more people like Tyler Hauck, 27, who pays $2,200 a month for his 1½ bedroom apartment, that he says is “definitely a high-end” building tighten to one of a region’s transformation lines. “On a area list serve, people contend things like ‘You’re profitable all this income and we don’t have room for a car?’”


Urban firmness got a bad rap someday in a mid-19th century—nobody found any saving value in a packed Victorian slums of London—and by a commencement of a 20th century, a Englishman Ebenzer Howard’s judgment of a “Garden City,” a array of superficial satellite villages to a larger, determined executive city, became a convictions of city planners around a world.

In a United States, a judgment of firmness was serve discredited after World War II when a antithesis—suburban subdivisions with vast lots, abundant cul-de-sacs and vast connector roads to pierce people from home to bureau park to selling mall—became not only a normal though a ideal. Aided and abetted by a construction of a federally-funded Interstate Highway System and inexpensive Federal Housing Authority loans directed during single-family homes for returning veterans, stretch widespread opposite a republic like a wildfire.

Public transformation ridership appearance in 1956, a same year that Dwight Eisenhower sealed legislation formulating a Interstate Highway System, whose strange 41,000 miles helped flue a country’s change toward suburbia.

Over time, a building practices that facilitated a classical suburban lifestyle became codified in internal zoning ordinances, meant to apart commerce and residential life, and in wonky papers like a Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Parking Generation manual, that lays out a firm ratio for a series of parking spaces compulsory by several buildings, and has prolonged served as a bible for developers and internal officials. The manual’s fourth and latest edition, published in 2010, includes a series of suggested parking spots for 106 apart land-use classifications, including mosques, synagogues, motorcycle dealerships, and coffee and donut shops with a drive-thru window and those without. It’s a well-meaning book, created by well-meaning people, though a assumptions and mind-set of Parking Generation and other papers like it wreaked massacre on post-war sprawl—pushing American cities ever outward, formulating decades of investment in billions of dollars of ever-wider interstates, and contributing to a republic choked by vehicle emissions and horrible traffic.

By a 1980s, even close-in American suburbs like Evanston were commencement to be hollowed out by sprawl, as their residents decamped for cheaper exurbs fueled by new selling malls filled with vast box stores.

Now, a half-century after a arise of a vehicle remade a American landscape, a new era of civic planners is perplexing to retreat a dominance. “We provide a land as meaningless when it’s not,” explains Yonah Freemark, indicating to a “dead” propagandize sight sitting in a probably dull parking lot roughly directly underneath Chicago’s “L” train, as he walks along a city’s North Milwaukee Avenue.

At a internal Metropolitan Planning Council, Freemark works on what’s famous as “transit-oriented development,” TOD for short, a civic pattern transformation that’s helped change places like Evanston—the thought that developers will wish to incorporate mass transformation into their formulation and, in turn, daunt new residents from owning cars in a initial place. It’s a formulation judgment that’s helped spin around Evanston’s trajectory, luring behind residents and a new era of millennials for whom “density” is indeed a certain attribute.

It’s an thought that has a roots in an doubtful place a hemisphere away— one faced with a really opposite set of challenges.


The problem in a 1970s in Brazil’s southern city of Curitiba wasn’t a miss of growth, though too most of it, too fast. The rural center’s race had rocketed from about 200,000 in 1950 to some-more than 600,000 in 1970—and it would scarcely double again by 1980 on a proceed to 1.8 million people today, creation it Brazil’s seventh largest city. Alarmed by a bomb growth, a city incited to a new era of civic planners during a internal university, where they found Jaime Lerner, afterwards a 30-something designer whose relatives had immigrated from Poland, and who had an desirous civic vision. In a years ahead, Lerner would reconstitute Curitiba, turn a mayor and eventually a administrator of a surrounding state of Paraná, swelling his mantra that “City is not a problem, city is solution.”

More from POLITICO Magazine

About admin

Scroll To Top