Click Here!Click Here!
Home / Business / MetLife ‘Strongly Disagrees’ With FSOC Systemic Risk Tag
MetLife ‘Strongly Disagrees’ With FSOC Systemic Risk Tag

MetLife ‘Strongly Disagrees’ With FSOC Systemic Risk Tag

MetLife Inc. (MET) was deemed systemically critical by a row of regulators, a preference that would theme a biggest U.S. life insurer to stricter Federal Reserve oversight.

“MetLife strongly disagrees” with a Financial Stability Oversight Council’s pierce today, Chief Executive Officer Steven Kandarian pronounced in a statement. “MetLife has served as a source of financial strength and fortitude during times of mercantile distress, including a 2008 financial crisis.”

The preference is a intensity better for Kandarian, who worked to equivocate a systemically critical designation. Kandarian, who has called regulatory doubt a primary plea to assembly distinction targets, met with regulators and lawmakers and submitted thousands of pages of ancillary papers in hostile a label.

MetLife isn’t statute out any accessible pill to a FSOC’s decision, a New York-based insurer said. Today’s opinion was a due designation. The association has 30 days to ask a conference before a FSOC to competition a decision. After a hearing, regulators would reason a final opinion on either to appropriate MetLife.

The legislature currently also “continued a contention per a ongoing comment of a asset-management attention and perceived an refurbish from staff on these efforts,” according to a matter expelled currently by a Treasury Department.

Asset Managers

The FSOC had pronounced in Jul it would concentration on item managers’ activities and products, relocating divided from installation a firms systemically important. The regulators had formerly discussed either item firms such as BlackRock Inc. and Fidelity Investments should be designated.

The council, that has 10 voting members and is led by Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew, doesn’t recover a names of companies unless a nomination is made. The Treasury pronounced in a matter that a opinion “was unanimous with one member voting present.”

The FSOC has been criticized by lawmakers and attention groups that wish some-more information on a council’s deliberations.

Benjamin Lawsky, New York’s superintendent of financial services, pronounced in a Jul 30 minute to Lew that MetLife’s word businesses already are “carefully regulated” by his department. The insurer “does not rivet in non-traditional, non-insurance activities that emanate any discernible systemic risk,” he wrote.

Oversight Panel

The FSOC’s voting members also embody a heads of a Fed, a Securities and Exchange Commission and a Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

The legislature has designated 3 non-bank financial companies systemically important: insurers American International Group Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc., and General Electric Co.’s financial arm. A two-thirds vote, including Lew’s, is required.

AIG, that perceived and afterwards repaid a $182.3 billion U.S. bailout after it was incompetent to accommodate obligations during a derivatives unit, is one of a categorical reasons a FSOC was formed.

Created by a 2010 Dodd-Frank law, a legislature is charged with monitoring intensity threats to a financial system. Under Dodd-Frank, bank-holding companies with some-more than $50 billion in assets, such as Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Co., are overseen by a Fed.

To hit a reporters on this story: Ian Katz in Washington during; Zachary Tracer in New York during

To hit a editors obliged for this story: Dan Kraut during Brendan Murray, Dan Reichl

About admin

Scroll To Top