Click Here!Click Here!
Home / Politics / Joshua J. Whitfield: How politics distorts religion
Joshua J. Whitfield: How politics distorts religion

Joshua J. Whitfield: How politics distorts religion

Among Republicans during a 1968 presidential gathering in Miami, Norman Mailer sensed what he called “the pale tragedy of a Wasp,” simmering stress for a ended America, a regressive America, an America underneath conflict from within and without. It was, Mailer noted, eremite anxiety. The representatives “were looking for a personality to pierce America behind to them, their America, Jesusland.”

Of march they nominated Nixon, and we all know what became of him. It’s a story not though together and warning.

But that’s not what bothers me as we pierce on from a dual vital presidential conventions, both producing clearly ancestral nominations both possibly splendid or meaningful depending on whom we ask.

Particular candidacies are not what regard me during this point. By now they’re famous entities. Now and until Nov we will simply watch soundbites, clips and memes, annoy friends on Facebook and get raw in return. The rest of a choosing will be like examination TMZ, usually reduction funny. 

Rather, my regard is what Mailer observed, that comfortless eremite stress for a ended and apparently some-more divinely sanctified America. It is engaging a stress sacrament has so distant played in this election. It speaks to crises of identity, of existential crises clumsily articulated. Code for a common sickness, a participation of sacrament in this choosing signifies a inlet of a worry, a anomie.

And since of this I’m fearful of what’s apropos of sacrament itself (or we should contend religions themselves) — not theologically or spiritually, though sociologically and personally.

They are pang distortion. Religion, or religions, are apropos something definitely other than what they are in a minds of many, focussed over approval around domestic agendas. We see this among both a right and a left.

Tim Kaine is a Catholic though clearly really resourceful about it. This shouldn’t warn anyone; he’s a politician. Catholic politicians have been mostly sellouts for half a century now. In fact what we see in Kaine isn’t rare to politicians during all. He stands with millions of feeble shaped Catholics, many of whom are simply ignorant of a faith they consider they have appropriated. Often their probity and even their faith is quite informative and therefore quite flexible.

This is Kaine. This is Catholicism distorted. And there are many like him.

But exaggeration abounds among a domestic right too, equally grotesque. Theologians, priests, pastors — amateur and differently — all politically committed to a right to start with, now contest among themselves as eremite contortionists perplexing to support a male clearly offensive and though character, ruining their sacrament before a claimant they support can do it himself.

Wayne Grudem, for example, after reminding us of his imagination in Christian ethics, deduction to ask us to clear a means by a illusory ends of a prejudiced megalomaniac. Chanting a dim litany of baleful possibilities if Hillary Clinton were inaugurated president, he suggests it might be a impiety voting for anyone though Donald Trump. Overlook his “flaws,” he says; worry instead about her “evil.” Leave it to a eremite to paint matters so starkly, so many a conflict of light opposite dark.

This is Grudem. This is Christianity distorted. And there are many like him.

But what can a honestly eremite do? How can we be authentic though possibly pang or furthering a exaggeration of religion?

As a Catholic, I’ve stamped on myself a difference of one of a poets, Charles Peguy. An honest person, he said, “must be a incessant renegade.” To be faithful, such a chairman contingency be “continually unfaithful;” to “remain true to justice,” such a chairman contingency be “continually dishonest to inexhaustibly jubilant injustices.”

In this suggestion we reject both possibilities and impugn a rest. we don’t know who I’ll opinion for, though it won’t be for them. we reject a apparition of being obliged for history, a idolatry that we contingency select between them.

To be faithful, be dishonest to celebration and politician. Revert to an strange politics, a politics of love, elementary and unsystematic, a many ominous politics of all. This is a authentic alternative, a usually viable third candidacy. It’s how to sojourn honestly eremite amidst eremite distortion. It might not win in November, though it will win in a end. 

Father Joshua J. Whitfield is a prejudiced vicar and executive of faith arrangement and preparation during St. Rita Catholic Church in Dallas. Email: jwhitfield@stritaparish.net

About admin

Scroll To Top