Click Here!Click Here!
Home / Sports / Can Texas and Oklahoma work together in Big 12 expansion?
Can Texas and Oklahoma work together in Big 12 expansion?

Can Texas and Oklahoma work together in Big 12 expansion?

The Big 12 says it’s going to enhance past a stream 10-school membership, and a politics behind a preference could spin uncanny quickly.

ESPN’s Jake Trotter has an engaging new article. In it, he writes about a intensity energetic between a Big 12’s many absolute schools. Oklahoma has a eye on BYU as a tip enlargement candidate. A Sooner-led pull to supplement BYU could be closely intertwined with a Texas-led expostulate to supplement Houston. But we also already knew OU substantially wants Cincinnati as well.

When Texas’ university boss came out in support of “considering” Houston for a Big 12, apparently for domestic reasons, it came as a surprise. Conventional knowledge has prolonged hold that Texas wouldn’t be meddlesome in compelling another in-state recruiting rival.

The Longhorns haven’t publicly endorsed adding Houston, yet they certain seem interested. When Texas Tech followed suit, it was even some-more surprising, since a Red Raiders are a smaller module and mount to remove some-more in recruiting by a betterment of another Power 5 Texan. The politicians are onboard, too. TCU and Baylor haven’t done open comments..

Could Oklahoma and Texas do some equine trading?

To supplement a new member, 8 of 10 Big 12 schools need to opinion in preference of a inclusion.

Oklahoma and Texas are powerful, and they’ve prolonged been suspicion to authority a courtesy of geographic Big 12 voting blocs, with the Longhorns wrangling many of a league’s 3 other Texan schools and a Sooners being a longtime many outspoken proponents of expansion.

It isn’t tough to suppose a unfolding in that Texas boss Greg Fenves whips support for BYU’s inclusion and, in return, Oklahoma boss David Boren delivers votes for Houston.

Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby has pronounced a joining could enhance by possibly dual or 4 teams, or maybe zero during all.

Oklahoma also wants Cincinnati, and that’d make three. But anything some-more than dual competence open another can of enlargement worms even more.

The Big 12 has dual TV partners: ABC/ESPN and FOX.

The approach a league’s contracts with a TV providers are drawn up, a networks need to compensate proportional increases to a Big 12 for each new member. Based on stream terms, that translates to an additional $25 million or so per year for each addition.

Because a Big 12’s extend of media rights to ESPN and Fox runs by 2025, that would meant adult to $800 million in new income from ESPN and Fox if a joining stretched by 4 teams. Two-team enlargement would cost about $400 million. The networks are reportedly unfortunate about all this.

Here’s ESPN’s Trotter:

If a Big 12 pulls a trigger on expansion, one chance a networks would have would be to ask an prolongation to a extend of rights, to during slightest benefit long-term confidence for a league’s live content. Recently, ESPN concluded with a ACC on a network, that will launch in 2019. In exchange, ESPN got a ACC to pointer an prolongation of a extend of rights by 2035-36.

The disproportion with a Big 12 is that ESPN and Fox, contractually, have zero to precedence a discussion for a extend of rights prolongation — a $25 million-per-school increases are already in a contract.

On this one, ESPN and Fox can usually ask and hope.

Several Big 12 members’ interests substantially would align with a networks’.

A vital duty of a extend of rights is to forestall any propagandize from collecting TV income from another joining until a aged conference’s understanding expires. From there, a longer extend of rights binds a Big 12 together. And for schools like Iowa State or Kansas State (which competence not have a place to land in a Power 5 if a Big 12 dissolved), a some-more fast a Big 12 is, a better.

The networks would substantially rather not compensate out vast sums to a Big 12. But if they do, a pledge they won’t remove a skill altogether wouldn’t be a bad consolation.

It’s going to be tough for everybody to get what they want.

Texas could assistance get votes for BYU, and Oklahoma could do a same for Houston, and a networks could settle for two-team enlargement that costs a lot yet not as most as 4 teams.

That would need Oklahoma to scapegoat a Cincinnati goal, or maybe to barter a Bearcats for BYU. It could also cost a networks a lot of money.

Another choice is four-team expansion, yet how would a Big 12 lessen a networks’ concerns about costs?

Or, zero of this could happen, even yet a Big 12 has announced it’s about to expand. This has already been going on perpetually anyway.

About admin

Scroll To Top